[臨時措施]16/12起, CX250由倫敦返香港需停阿姆斯特丹

[ref=444909]yuenpo[/ref]  在 2005-12-16 08:12 發表:

我根據 a.net 篇文
會唔會係CX在LHR拿到的油 total 只夠 3 班機用,咁CX決定fill 滿其中三班的油缸
剩餘果班就去AMS度取油呢?
總比四班都要去搵地方補油好掛

咁客觀D去睇件事...我都明CX點解會咁做...
CX250後面兩部都係34C, 34C行LHR<--->HKG正常來講都要去到全速,
加上油缸較細, 所以做唔到飛LHR再飛阿姆斯特丹先加油..再者, 佢地都唔可以
好似744咁追時間....
我就只係諗唔明一個POINT....點解CX252可以冇事...

今早的CX252的EXPECTATION仲早左成半小時...
唔知CX一陣會有乜樣安撫下我地呢?!

剛剛出左消息, 17號飛的CX250同樣需要停阿姆斯特丹 ....
即係都好大機會關油庫單野事啦...
早知我琴日飛啦...激死!

[ Last edited by hkbw on 2005-12-16 at 17:53 ]

[ref=445155]hkbw[/ref]  在 16-12-2005 17:39 發表:
剛剛出左消息, 17號飛的CX250同樣需要停阿姆斯特丹 ....
即係都好大機會關油庫單野事啦...
早知我琴日飛啦...激死!

咪當是"特別經歷"...
"屈"在天空都幾悶的
看多些景色不好嗎?
(雖然出不了機行行)

[ref=445242]CardCaptor[/ref]  在 2005-12-16 19:14 發表:



咪當是"特別經歷"...
"屈"在天空都幾悶的
看多些景色不好嗎?
(雖然出不了機行行)

而家, 只係因為趕唔切返團契, 再加上國泰比埋D不合理的理由, 所以
先嬲者...

屈係部機度, 補油時都唔知會唔會開冷氣TIM AR....
唔好好似BA咁就得了...

I took the CX252 last Sunday(the day of incident happened in Hertfordshire) and the flight was 1hr delayed on departure. The E.A.T to HKG was 0826 but finally we landed at 0755 (20 mins behind), the max speed of B-HKE (ex- SQ 747-412) I noticed was 1076km/h and most of the time we were on 875km/h.

The B747-412 I was on (B-HKE) was not comfaortable as CX's B747-467s. The seats are narrower than original CX's 744 and the media control system is like those on Airbus, wired control and located on side instead of arm rest.

not a good journey although this is my 1st time on B HKE, but otherwise I was next to the engine and the PW seems as quiet as RR.

[ref=445249]hkbw[/ref]  在 16-12-2005 19:27 發表:



而家, 只係因為趕唔切返團契, 再加上國泰比埋D不合理的理由, 所以
先嬲者...

屈係部機度, 補油時都唔知會唔會開冷氣TIM AR....
唔好好似BA咁就得了...

之前說過的
意外就是沒法避免
只好嘆倒楣...

補油不會冷氣
想被乘客鬧咩?

雖然講大話不太好,
但係對一般既人來說,
如果cx同你話冇油,你會點唸...

[ref=444913]s3n370[/ref]  在 2005-12-16 08:31 發表:



倫敦同阿姆斯特丹有一個鐘時差(LON: GMT+0, AMS: GMT+1)，
以當地時間計，一個鐘機程再加一個鐘時差就0岩0岩係“兩個鐘”後到。

不過小弟有個疑問，就係AMS-HKG同LHR-HKG個距離都唔係差太多，
就算因為要 ...

CX's B742 was stopped at Bahrain for refuel, it wasnt a direct flight in my memory

http://www.ananova.com/news/story/sm_1649744.html?menu=

Seems like LHR situation is getting worse...

[ref=445359]norrislaw[/ref]  在 2005-12-16 09:52 PM 發表:



CX's B742 was stopped at Bahrain for refuel, it wasnt a direct flight in my memory

據國泰網站“倫敦線加至每日四班”的新聞稿，及由Martin J. Willing著的
From Betsy to Boeing : the aircraft of Cathay Pacific Airways, 1946-1988，
皆有提及自83年7月2日起，LON/HKG首設不停站的服務。
743都係0係果年先開始面世。

初期只係倫敦往香港設有不停站航班，後來香港往倫敦亦增設不停站航班。
如果無記錯的話，到八十年代尾，仲有部份航班係經巴林ge。

不過有無人知道LON-HKG要到幾時才全面直航？

[ Last edited by s3n370 on 2005-12-17 at 14:16 ]

[ref=445155]hkbw[/ref]  在 2005-12-16 05:39 PM 發表:



咁客觀D去睇件事...我都明CX點解會咁做...
CX250後面兩部都係34C, 34C行LHR<--->HKG正常來講都要去到全速,
加上油缸較細, 所以做唔到飛LHR再飛阿姆斯特丹先加油..再者, 佢地都唔可以
好似744咁追時 ...

According to CX's web, there are only 2 days (16/12, 17/12) of CX250 will via AMS~~
on 18/12's CX250 is in normal operation...