自動波車空波滑行是好是壞?

空波滑行本可達省油目的

為棍波車主的慣常做法

但又有人說自動波車絕不能空波滑行 否則傷車



究竟自動波車以空波滑行有問題嗎?

我覺得無問題
因為當你推番空波果陣
引擎轉速只會變番怠速
你轉番波果陣唔踩油就得

如果會壞,咁拖波都會壞

我都聽過，不過我到燈口，返到村條斜路，都係入空波
暫時唔覺架車有咩問題

PS.如果會傷車，咁整個N係度做咩呢？係咪？

原帖由 MEMPHIX 於 2006-5-11 07:48 PM 發表
我都聽過，不過我到燈口，返到村條斜路，都係入空波
暫時唔覺架車有咩問題

PS.如果會傷車，咁整個N係度做咩呢？係咪？

基本上架車行得出街就會傷!

停車時入 N 波溜停無問題，但係就唔可以o係高速下由 N 轉回 D 囉﹗如果唔係波箱好快玩完~

不過呢, 自動波唔空波滑行一定無問題, 空波滑行就唔知有冇問題. 波箱壞左要整好金,
油又唔知可以慳到幾多, 滑行時落迫力又無 Engine brake, 皮都要蝕多d...

博唔博樓主自己楂主意啦...

如果習慣空波滑行，日日N-D-N唔知幾多次，日積月累易壞係正常架喎。

I have heard about that, using N to roll will cause more tear & wear on the brakes for automatic gearbox cars, because with auto cars, the engine will electronically control the rev when slowing down, hence reducing the force applied on the brake. When you are on N, the gearbox is not initiated with the engine, so therefore it wouldn't be doing this.

Whether this is scientific proven I have no idea, as I am not in the mechanics field.

OT:Also, when I was trained up by my bus company, we have been instructed to never push to N unless handbrake is applied and the bus is stationary, auto gearboxes on buses (ZF etc) cannot be pushed to N and let the bus run on free-fall, as it will drain all the air ("wind") when the brakes are applied, the gearboxes helps slowing down the bus significantly. So I would assume similar ideas would apply to a car.

[ 本帖最後由 kmb3asv3 於 2006-5-12 12:51 編輯 ]

原帖由 kmb3asv3 於 2006-5-12 10:50 發表
OT:Also, when I was trained up by my bus company, we have been instructed to never push to N unless handbrake is applied and the bus is stationary, auto gearboxes on buses (ZF etc) cannot be pushed to N and let the bus run on free-fall, as it will drain all the air ("wind") when the brakes are applied, the gearboxes helps slowing down the bus significantly. So I would assume similar ideas would apply to a car.

不過我諗私家車唔會好似巴士咁有吹梳的. 不過聰明 D 既自動波就會係踏迫力
時幫你拖低波. (楂開部Corolla就唔識, 要自己用OD on/off控制)

原帖由 FX8173 於 2006-5-11 20:03 發表
停車時入 N 波溜停無問題，但係就唔可以o係高速下由 N 轉回 D 囉﹗如果唔係波箱好快玩完~

那為何棍波車可以這樣做?