問CRH1-250, CRH6, CRH380C/D
[複製鏈接]
|
原帖由 Oliver_ME16 於 2010-12-16 12:27 發表 
用長凳唔多覺有乜問題,
千九個design max speed一樣可以去到160km/h
咪一樣用長凳?
最緊要切合倒路線客量既需要o者
Just feel a bit weird.
Imagine Akita Shinkansen E3/E6 trains use longitudinal seating. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
原帖由 Kaix 於 2010-12-16 23:17 發表
Just feel a bit weird.
Imagine Akita Shinkansen E3/E6 trains use longitudinal seating.
Tsukuba Express都有計劃過行160km/h啦....
longitudinal seating有咩問題
[ 本帖最後由 herman15hk 於 2010-12-18 04:17 編輯 ] |
|
|
少甜啊唔該
|
|
|
|
|
|
原帖由 herman15hk 於 2010-12-17 00:00 發表
Tsukuba Express都有計劃過行160km/h啦....
It's not the speed, but the train.
I just think commuter trains shouldn't be called CRH. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CRH6 can reach 250km/h. It's stupid that the head is not "bullet" shape. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
原帖由 Kaix 於 2010-12-17 18:22 發表
CRH6 can reach 250km/h. It's stupid that the head is not "bullet" shape.
咁相對DSB IC3用個凹頭行180都叫流線d ge |
|
|
少甜啊唔該
|
|
|
|
|
|
入面提及CRH6有220km/h級(2+2座椅)同160km/h級(縱向座椅)之分,
咁CRH1仲會唔會服務廣珠城際呢? |
|
|
獨愛☆OLYMPIANS~powered by~CUMMINS
|
|
|
|
|
|
原帖由 93A_S3_6:30am 於 2010-12-16 21:09 發表
千九design speed有160km/h?
有無source?
好耐之前有版友post上黎既,
講sp1900改齒輪比就可以上到160,
但source我都冇響手 |
|
|
我...
|
|
|
|
|
|
原帖由 Kaix 於 2010-12-17 17:14 發表 
It's not the speed, but the train.
I just think commuter trains shouldn't be called CRH.
呢個我同意呀
不過大陸咩都要和諧, 咩都要快
叫CRH6 係國情來的 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
|
