找回密碼
 會員申請加入
搜索

[SIN] 即日消息:新捷运新订单

[複製鏈接]
NV58 發表於 2010-9-8 03:45 | 顯示全部樓層

                                    Advertisement



原帖由 TIB1232Z 於 2010-9-7 06:48 發表


Exterior photo (of the Wright prototype) is also available: http://www.hkitalk.net/SPT/viewthread.php?tid=1871&extra=page%3D1&page=7

This also means the prototype is already here.   


Cool shot. Only thing is the livery application is not as good as I was hoping. They can do without all that violet at the bumper area.
Tinyl Bus Photography - FB Group
 樓主| TIB1232Z 發表於 2010-9-8 07:57 | 顯示全部樓層
原帖由 NV58 於 2010-9-8 03:45 發表


Cool shot. Only thing is the livery application is not as good as I was hoping. They can do without all that violet at the bumper area.


Exactly... I think the designer for the livery has some serious problem with artwork...
on11358 發表於 2010-9-8 20:53 | 顯示全部樓層
新加坡果部樣版好似係曲梯?
AL_29 發表於 2010-9-9 17:14 | 顯示全部樓層

                                    Advertisement



原帖由 SBS7483U 於 2010-9-8 00:56 發表
True, but it is definitely better looking than gemilang buses. having 1103 (include 8031 8033 and 7888)  from sbst alone is already awful. And gemilang has made the local buses look so cheap.
I would  ...


But I prefer K230UB with Gemilang bodywork rather than Caetano as the interior design is much better.
Moreover, it has rear window and better heat-proof ( just my feeling), by comparing to Caetano.


As an old saying goes, the grass is always greener on the other side.
SBS7483U 發表於 2010-9-11 01:58 | 顯示全部樓層

回復 24# 的帖子

True! I think the Caetano body looks better on K310. The K230 looks better with Gemilang.

Many SG bus fans dislike the Gemilang, probably the reason being the K230s.
 樓主| TIB1232Z 發表於 2010-9-14 17:18 | 顯示全部樓層
deleted post wrong

[ 本帖最後由 TIB1232Z 於 2010-9-14 17:23 編輯 ]
您需要登錄後才可以回帖 登錄 | 會員申請加入

本版積分規則

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

站規|清理本站Cookies|手機版|hkitalk.net 香港交通資訊網

GMT+8, 2025-12-19 07:44

Powered by Discuz! X3.5

© 2001-2025 Discuz! Team.

快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表